APRIL 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
Limitations on Interfaith Marriage Practices in Indonesia According to Human Rights Perspective
Andrew Betlehn
Lecturer of Postgraduate Masters in Law Program, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Jl. Pangeran Diponegoro No. 84-86, Central Jakarta, 10430
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-17

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Fundamental human rights in include the right to marry and start a family. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia assures such right in its Article 28B. An exception to such right is through Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage which states that marriages are only deemed legitimate if they are done according to each religion or belief. This prevents Indonesian citizens from having interfaith marriages. This paper aims to discuss such restriction in carrying out interfaith marriage in Indonesia in relation to the fundamental human right to marry and start a family. The result of the research shows that while Indonesia is based on the Pancasila which underlies the provision of the Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law, it still has the obligation as a living ideology to be protect all Indonesian’s interests, including families born out of interfaith marriages, and that the UDHR as an expression of the international community, clearly states the freedom to marry with no limitation due to religion.

KEYWORDS:

interfaith marriage; human rights; constitution; religion

REFERENCES

1) Amnesty International UK. 2017. Accessed from https://www.amnesty.org.uk/universal-declaration-human-rights-UDHR.

2) Australian Human Rights Commission. Accessed from https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/what-universal-declaration-human-rights.

3) Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU-XII/2014.

4) Hidayat, A. Indonesia Negara Berketuhanan. Accessed from https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/artikel/pdf/artikel_14_02_arief_hidayat.pdf.

5) International Committee of the Red Cross. International Humanitarial Law and International Human Rights Law: Similarities and differences. Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law. Accessed from https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/ihl_and_ihrl.pdf.

6) Karim, H. M., Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Cita Hukum Pancasila. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum.

7) Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage.

8) Law Number 23 of 2006 on Population Administration as has partially been revised through the Law Number 24 of 2013.

9) Sari, M. F., et. al. 2016. Analisis Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 68/PUU-XII/2014 atas Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama. Diponegoro Law Journal.

10) The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

11) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Accessed from https://www.un.org/en/udhrbook/pdf/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf.

12) United Nations. The Foundation of International Human Rights Law. Accessed from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/udhr/foundation-of-international-human-rights-law.

13) United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Accessed from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/internationallaw.aspx.

14) Wahyuni, S. 2011. Kontroversi Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia. Al-Risalah, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar